I think I’ve just confirmed that scoring for non synthesised lab results is not correct
my alternate identity http://eterna.cmu.edu/eterna_page.php…
now has 12910 points - it had 10000 points
it voted for the winner - gaining 970 points (fine)
and created this monstrosity called “awful dotplot and meltplot” (which is nothing like the winner)
and got 1940 points for that (perhaps it was so bad it was treated as being identical to the winner?) which is equivalent to a predicted 97% success rate.
Just thought I’d mention it - as it was so surprisingly unlike the winner it probably ought to have had very few points (which I gathered were earned for similarity to the winner)