# \[Strategy Market\] Cytosine Ratio

**URL:** https://forum.eternagame.org/t/strategy-market-cytosine-ratio/1269
**Category:** Strategy Market - Single State
**Created:** [March 19, 2012, 2:31pm UTC](https://forum.eternagame.org/t/strategy-market-cytosine-ratio/1269 "2012-03-19T14:31:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![paramodic](https://forum.eternagame.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/bbce88/32.png) [@paramodic](https://forum.eternagame.org/u/paramodic)
#### Post date: [March 19, 2012, 2:31pm UTC](https://forum.eternagame.org/t/strategy-market-cytosine-ratio/1269/1 "2012-03-19T14:31:00Z")

</div>

If an RNA has the same number of Cytosines as Guanines, consider it be neutral. If an RNA has fewer Cytosines than Guanines, reward it up to a certain point. I would say stop rewarding the structure at 25-50% fewer Cytosines than Guanines. If an RNA has more Cytosines than Guanines, penalize it. Penalize the RNA more severely as that ratio increases. That is, the penalty for 25% more C than G is less harsh than the penalty for 100% more C than G.

I’d also like to see this strategy operate in reverse, if possible- that is, reward the RNA for when C\>G and penalize it for when G\>C.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JeehyungLee](https://forum.eternagame.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/c77e96/32.png) [@JeehyungLee](https://forum.eternagame.org/u/JeehyungLee)
#### Post date: [April 23, 2012, 8:48pm UTC](https://forum.eternagame.org/t/strategy-market-cytosine-ratio/1269/2 "2012-04-23T20:48:00Z")

</div>

Dear, paramodic

Your strategy has been added to our implementation queue with task id 129. You can check the schedule of the implementation [here](https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?authkey=CKjd8JAB&hl=en&key=tUnfBv6tknYbY28ufrQ-Y2Q&hl=en&authkey=CKjd8JAB#gid=1).

Thanks for sharing your idea!

EteRNA team
