Thoughts from the recent discussion today. My focus is on puzzles that stomps InfoRNA.
It is my perception that too much symmetry and too much asymmetry makes the bots go mad.
Paramodic mentioned something: For example, they (bots) seem to also have issue with structures formed by repetetive sequences, so not just symmetrical structures, but repetetive ones.
I think Paramodic is on to something. Repetitative sequences, that might be the key to part of what makes bot fails.
Just like Dings mirrored snowflakes, are symmetric, they are also also repetitative.
Big symmetric puzzles are energeticly pressured, at least Dings snowflakes were, as the strings were relatively short and close to each other.
But small and asymmetric puzzles stumps bots too. Like Kudzu. Here the strings are very short, and the structure very energetic pressured.
I’m just thinking, what the big symmetric puzzles and the small symmetric puzzles that stomps bots have in common, are relatively short strings.
But well smaller symmetric puzzles stumps InfoRNA too. Especially if mirrored on more than one axe. Wonder if there is something there? Brourd’s clothespin spring are mirrored around two axes.
Ding’s snowflakes 4 (all of them) were mirrored on more that three axes. Notice the mirroing on the smaller arms too.
I’m think mirroring itself is a problem for the bots. As in a mirroring puzzle, too many regions are similar, which again makes bigger chances for mispairing, if arms are similarly solved. Mirroring in itself can also put energetic pressure on the puzzle especially if elements are close together and strings are short. The puzzle becomes like a handful of tightened bows, wanting to release the energy somewhere and pushing the structure apart.
With mirroring around axes, comes sharp angles. Sharp angles is often a problem for the bots. Like 90 degrees or smaller. The more two strings are bent close to each other, the harder to solve for us and bots don’t like them either.